How are NENs diagnosed?
A correct diagnosis is imperative for the patient to obtain the most efficient treatment. However, diagnosing NENs is challenging because symptoms are often nonspecific, such as chronic fatigue or pain unrelated to a specific injury. Often, NENs are found incidentally while testing for other conditions.
The ultimate NEN diagnosis can only be established with tissue biopsy and further tumor grading based on combining the proliferative index with cell mitotic rate.
Standard laboratory diagnosis assessment relies mainly on markers such as Chromogranin A (CHGA), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), synaptophysin (SYP), and neural cell adhesion molecule 1 (NCAM1 or CD56). However, while virtually all carcinoids are positive for SYP and CHGA, their expression is highly variable in NENs.
Therefore, the immunohistochemical assessment of the complex biomarker expression patterns in targeted biopsies is fundamental and instrumental in all phases of the diagnostic process, such as differentiation (neuroendocrine or epithelial origin) and proliferation (grading and staging)
First-generation IHC markers: an overview of NENs diagnosis in targeted biopsies
- Scope: Confirmation of neuroendocrine nature
Markers for neuroendocrine differentiation: Chromogranin A, Synaptophysin, CD56, CD57, UCHL1, NSE
- Scope: Confirmation of epithelial origin
Markers for epithelial differentiation: Cytokeratins AE1/AE3, CAM5.2, CK18, CK8
- Scope: Grading and staging
Marker for tumor proliferation: Ki-67
Second-generation IHC markers for NENs differentiation
The advent of second-generation NEN markers for IHC has considerably expanded the pathology toolbox, constituting markers that often retain expression even in poorly differentiated NECs.
Atlas Antibodies’ second-generation IHC monoclonal markers for NENs include:
- Anti-ISL1 (Isl Lim homeobox1, AMAb91729)
- Anti-INSM (Insm transcriptional repressor1, AMAb91727)
- Anti-SCGN (Secretagogin, AMAb90630, and AMAb90632)
- Anti-OTP (Orthopedia homeobox, AMAb91695, and AMAb91696)
As non-NENs rarely express these antigens, their specificity makes them welcome additions to clinical practice.
From a biological context, second-generation immunohistochemical NEN markers (functionally distinct from CHGA and SYP) are more consistent in terms of expression, even if the NEN downregulates its secretory machinery as part of the dedifferentiation process.
The combination of classical and new IHC markers should thus be part of the clinical routine arsenal to improve the diagnostic capability, as well as aid in therapy stratification and clinical follow-up.